
While indeed very significant, the Tribunal’s decision is also singular, as I am now the first licensed pilot with Type 1 diabetes to be allowed to fly solo in Australia. I had hoped that this decision would pave the way for other pilots and would-be pilots, whose condition is well controlled and who can jump through the necessary pre-qualification hoops, to follow in my footsteps. Unfortunately this may be some time yet, as CASA at this stage shows no signs of incorporating the FAA system into Australia’s medical standards. Instead, in CASA’s Autumn Newsletter to DAMEs they state:
CASA acknowledges the AAT decision, but will not be making any changes to the CASRs or guidance material as the outcome does not act as a precedent for other decisions…. CASA will continue to assess each application made by a type 1 diabetic on a case by case basis with respect to the standard in Part 67.
In other words, bad luck – the existing CASR Part 67 does not allow solo flight for pilots with Type 1 diabetes. If other applicants with Type 1 want to fly solo, they will have to navigate the tortuous and time-consuming AAT process to achieve their aim, with no guarantee of success. This is disappointing to say the least, considering that the Tribunal observed:
Having now been in operation for some 10 years, without a single incident attributable to diabetes, the FAA protocol is most certainly no longer experimental and its safety has been adequately demonstrated.
If anyone is contemplating using the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to resolve an issue, then my advice is to think very carefully about it because you only get one shot – Tribunal decisions are only appealable to the Federal Court on a matter of law, not on the facts of the issue. You must know your subject matter extremely well and be very well prepared in order to give evidence under oath and be cross-examined. You also need to be supported by good people who can give sworn expert evidence on your behalf.
It’s a rather daunting task for a self-represented individual pilot to take on a powerful and monolithic regulator like CASA, with endless resources at their disposal including an in-house Legal Services Group with consultant barrister, and expect to win. This is especially so, considering that another applicant to the Tribunal on the same matter was unsuccessful in 2003. At times it would have been all too easy to give in when the odds were stacked against me. But hey, Darryl Kerrigan did it in The Castle and now – so have I!
The full text of the Tribunal’s decision is available at:
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/aat/2006/1123.html
I would like to thank my family, friends and work colleagues who have given me encouragement over the years to see this through. I also especially want to thank all those intrepid pilots who have flown with me and kept me in the air over those ten years. Without them, I would have been permanently grounded. I have enjoyed flying with them in the past, and will again at night no doubt, but now for day VFR flights of less than three hours duration, which is 99% of my flying, it gives me the greatest of pleasure to sack them all!